When people go to art galleries, they wouldn't be surprised to see photographs among paintings for example. In the same way, you would expect that people could easily see films as art. After all, a film is just a bunch of pictures, but with audio attached to it. Yet you hardly ever hear people talking about cinematography when they walk out of a movie theater—unless they were watching some nature documentary, or they're a film student.
This semester I've been able to see that there is an extremely wide scope to the things film can capture, making it every bit an art form which fits so well into the book. I still may think that animators will get more out of it, simply because it is more focused on the created art (by which I mean drawings, paintings, etc), rather than other forms like film, which require a slightly different technique. Nonetheless, I love the book, don't even think about not reading it
No comments:
Post a Comment