The second thing they didn't explain was EXTREMELY important. It was the reason there was a story at all: why Jack/Eric committed the murder. If he had run away and gotten help, the rest of the story would have been so different. HOWEVER, I applaud the filmmakers for not explaining Jack's motives for murdering. I think it was a very good tactic, this unexpaination. I think American filmmakers would have tried to get into Jack's head. They would have had him monologueing about his memories of that moment; of what he could have done differently. It would have been cheesy and typical.
You people who saw the movie might be wondering what I mean when I say Jack's motives were unexplained. The explanation was obvious: he was influenced by his bad friendship and his lack of a loving home. But American filmmakers would have, like I said, gone so much farther, and it wouldn't have been as realistic. We'll never understand what goes through most murderer's heads when they decide to kill someone; and the psychology of child murderers especially frightens people. This movie was not about sensationalism; "Ooh, look how evil and messed up this kid's head is". It was about how we treat these kids after the fact.
And by the way, what's with the title; boy A? That's kind of abstract.
Boy A is a term used for children who murder. When they are talked about in public their identities are kept hidden since they are minors. So they are called 'Boy A'.
ReplyDeleteI only know this because of a famous Boy A (or Shonen A, since he was Japanese) in Japan who at age 14 killed two elementary school students, beheading one and putting his head in front of his school.
Random fact of the day *disappears*
Ah, thanks Kayla. Seriously, I like to know what the titles are about.
Delete